Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typo in featurization.ipynb #693

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/examples/featurization.ipynb
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@
"source": [
"### Using feature hashing\n",
"\n",
"In fact, the `StringLookup` layer allows us to configure multiple OOV indices. If we do that, any raw value that is not in the vocabulary will be deterministically hashed to one of the OOV indices. The more such indices we have, the less likley it is that two different raw feature values will hash to the same OOV index. Consequently, if we have enough such indices the model should be able to train about as well as a model with an explicit vocabulary without the disdvantage of having to maintain the token list."
"In fact, the `StringLookup` layer allows us to configure multiple OOV indices. If we do that, any raw value that is not in the vocabulary will be deterministically hashed to one of the OOV indices. The more such indices we have, the less likely it is that two different raw feature values will hash to the same OOV index. Consequently, if we have enough such indices the model should be able to train about as well as a model with an explicit vocabulary without the disdvantage of having to maintain the token list."
]
},
{
Expand Down