Add benchmarks for magnolify-parquet vs parquet-avro R/W

[clairemcginty]

Adds benchmarks for Parquet read/write performance, for both magnolify-parquet and parquet-avro (although we don't own parquet-avro, it's helpful to compare against IMO).

Parquet is a little tricky in that it doesn't have a granular "write/read a single record to/from a file" operation due to its complex file structure/encodings. This benchmark sets up an in-memory page store that can can read or write Parquet "groups", which are Parquet's internal record structure. Read/write is invoked with a record type T and a matching RecordConverter[T], which converts either case classes (magnolify-parquet) or Avro records (parquet-avro) into Parquet groups. Thus, what we're benchmarking here is Group-to-record and record-to-Group conversion, which is the core functionality of magnolify-parquet 👍

Results (run locally w 64GB M1 mac + OpenJDK 17.0.5):

% sbt "jmh/jmh:run -i 10 -wi 10 -f1 -t .*parquet.*"
[info] Benchmark                           Mode  Cnt      Score     Error  Units
[info] ParquetBench.parquetReadAvro       avgt   10  12693.357 ± 208.175  ns/op
[info] ParquetBench.parquetReadMagnolify  avgt   10  13695.172 ± 311.972  ns/op
[info] ParquetBench.parquetWriteAvro       avgt   10  9621.541 ±   81.569  ns/op
[info] ParquetBench.parquetWriteMagnolify  avgt   10  5527.228 ± 70.377  ns/op

[clairemcginty]

this needed to be updated from the ExampleType rework

[RustedBones]

IMHO we should bench the apply methods

[clairemcginty]

Yeah, that would be good! I'll do that in a followup PR

[clairemcginty]

These classes are heavily based on this parquet-java package, which sadly are not a part of any artifact: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/tree/master/parquet-column/src/test/java/org/apache/parquet/column/page/mem

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.50%. Comparing base (a3708ba) to head (bded9b4).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1040   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.50%   95.50%           
=======================================
  Files          56       56           
  Lines        1980     1980           
  Branches      186      186           
=======================================
  Hits         1891     1891           
  Misses         89       89           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.