Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Draft] MPL review gap #550

Draft
wants to merge 633 commits into
base: python-reviewed
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

lucasmcdonald3
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

Squash/merge commit message, if applicable:

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2024

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2024

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2024

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants