Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SNOW-1524454: Too many dependencies in Snowflake.Data nuget package #991

Closed
AndreyTomilinXmpi opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
duplicate status-triage_done Initial triage done, will be further handled by the driver team

Comments

@AndreyTomilinXmpi
Copy link

AndreyTomilinXmpi commented Jul 8, 2024

These are current package dependencies:

Apache.Arrow (>= 14.0.2)
AWSSDK.S3 (>= 3.7.0.4)
Azure.Storage.Blobs (>= 12.13.0)
Azure.Storage.Common (>= 12.12.0)
BouncyCastle.Cryptography (>= 2.2.1)
Google.Cloud.Storage.V1 (>= 4.6.0)
log4net (>= 2.0.12)
Mono.Unix (>= 7.1.0-final.1.21458.1)
Newtonsoft.Json (>= 13.0.3)
System.IdentityModel.Tokens.Jwt (>= 6.34.0)
System.Text.RegularExpressions (>= 4.3.1)

My problem is that I'm are using Amazon and I don't need all other providers (libraries). It becomes complex to update all these packages and produces package version conflicts.

Why not create multiple Snowflake libraries so that each of them will support a specific cloud provider.
Say, Amazon library is divided into multiple libraries. Each of them is intended for a specific service.
For example:

Snowflake.Data.Azure
Snowflake.Data.Google
Snowflake.Data.Amazon

Also, would be great if you would use built in JSON and Logging libraries instead of using third party ones.

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Too many dependencies in Snowflake.Data nuget package SNOW-1524454: Too many dependencies in Snowflake.Data nuget package Jul 8, 2024
@sfc-gh-dszmolka sfc-gh-dszmolka self-assigned this Jul 9, 2024
@sfc-gh-dszmolka sfc-gh-dszmolka added duplicate status-triage_done Initial triage done, will be further handled by the driver team and removed feature labels Jul 9, 2024
@sfc-gh-dszmolka
Copy link
Contributor

sfc-gh-dszmolka commented Jul 9, 2024

hi, closing this as a duplicate of

but if something is not tracked on the aforementioned tickets, do comment please

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate status-triage_done Initial triage done, will be further handled by the driver team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants