Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can the Data Types section be replaced by a reference to the format registry? #131

Open
darrelmiller opened this issue Jun 9, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@darrelmiller
Copy link
Member

Instead of this paragraph, can we reference this https://spec.openapis.org/registry/format/index.html

@handrews
Copy link
Member

handrews commented Jun 9, 2024

I think we'd have to talk about which formats are MUST/SHOULD/MAY be supported.

@LasneF
Copy link
Member

LasneF commented Jul 23, 2024

notice few of them has no source like

  • decimal
  • int16 (vs int32 is set as OAS)
  • http date where we could put the RFC
  • decimal128
  • char
  • base64url

notice that to me decimal is highly debatable as does not belong to a standard and clear definition

is 1 a decimal ? is 1.0 a decimal what is the parsing expression that should be applied having a dot ?
is 4.5e3 a decimal , but then what about 4.5345e3

as this format is mentionned as not interoperable , should it be part of an open standard ?

this may apply the rules MUST / SHOULD / MAY .... and not listed in this table , meaning what is the criteria to be in
having interoperability and defined standard may be a criteria, then all that is not is custom extension

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants