You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I’d really appreciate it if someone could take a look at PR #225 when they have a moment. I noticed that some other repos implement this feature in a way that seems a bit cumbersome — specifically, defining a schema object separately from the actual type can make maintenance and debugging more challenging. Instead, I opted to infer the schema directly from the provided type. I’d love to hear your thoughts on whether this approach aligns with the vision for this repo. Thanks!
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I’d really appreciate it if someone could take a look at PR #225 when they have a moment. I noticed that some other repos implement this feature in a way that seems a bit cumbersome — specifically, defining a schema object separately from the actual type can make maintenance and debugging more challenging. Instead, I opted to infer the schema directly from the provided type. I’d love to hear your thoughts on whether this approach aligns with the vision for this repo. Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions